• aramis87@fedia.io
    34·
    4 months ago

    The sailor, whose name the Navy will not disclose, was administratively disciplined

    I wonder what the punishment was.

    • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
      30·
      4 months ago

      I’m assuming enlisted since it says sailor and not officer, so I can make a guess. Captain’s Mast, busted down a rank, loss of half pay for a month or two, restriction for a month or two, extra duties for up to 45 days.

      If I was a gambling man I’d say the full 2 months at half pay, busted down, and the full 45 day with restriction and extra duties without the extra 15 days of restriction along with an official letter of reprimand that stays in their service record. The odds of them getting an honorable discharge goes down due to that, but it’s possible if they turn their shit around. That last part can haunt them for life if they end up with anything less than general under honorable conditions.

      Restriction if the sailor is deployed means they stay on the ship when everyone else goes home or on shore leave. If you’re on base you don’t get to leave the base and many of the bases have a specific building where those folks are kept together. It’s kind of like being in recruit training without the extra instruction and without most of the forced exercise, plus you can still drink soda and eat garbage in the galley. In both cases you don’t get a lot of unsupervised time.

      • Emmy@lemmy.nz
        2·
        4 months ago

        The odds of them getting an honorable discharge goes down due to that, but it’s possible if they turn their shit around.

        Unless trump wins the election

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    10·
    4 months ago

    Anyone’s health records should be restricted and include an audit trail of anyone who’s accessed them. Idk why the article made it sound sad of this is preferential to the presidency.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.worldEnglish
      9·
      4 months ago

      Way back when, I worked for what was then called First Union bank (now Wells Fargo by way of Wachovia) as an online tech support person. During training we were told that all account accesses are logged, but certain accounts (e.g., president or vice president) were also actively watched, and could result in a visit from the secret service.

      I would imagine that’s a common protocol in scenarios like this; all access is logged, but certain high profile individuals get that extra umph and are also actively monitored for access.

      • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
        2·
        4 months ago

        I would imagine that in this case the access is restricted to a specific group of users IDs but the system logged the attempt to log in (and was actively monitored for attempts).

    • Kadaj21@lemmy.worldEnglish
      6·
      4 months ago

      Health Care “System” I worked for tracked and audited this automatically. Could only access patient data of patients you were assign and the software tracked how often and when the data was accessed. Had a nurse almost get canned because the software showed that she was accessing a patient’s data outside of hours she would have been seeing the patient. Turns out her install was buggy. Forgot what exactly it was that cleared her.

      But yeah, I’d have to think the records of the president would have much more security lol. Or maybe not?

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        2·
        4 months ago

        OMG, a buggy install did that? How on earth?! I hope she was compensated for undue stress, poor lady. I would think anyone in public service would have extra security, but who knows?