The ruling makes a distinction between official actions of a president, which have immunity, and those of a private citizen. In dissent, the court’s liberals lament a vast expansion of presidential power.
Nah - I’m quite happy having a skewed and false idea about how us politics and law work. But even Europe needs to prepare. We need new immigration laws so we don’t get overwhelmed by US citizens fleeing their country only to impose the same values on us that destroyed their country.
“Oh so please create a lesson plan for me with links and references so I can learn!”
You sound like a jackass.
You are winning people over all the time with your great reasoning. Don’t venture outside your echo chambers
Do I have to put together some links on how reasoning works too, champ?
You should focus on covering your ass as you’re about to be royally fucked
You think you’re immune? That’s funny.
Yeah - I live far away
You probably do need those notes
Nah - I’m quite happy having a skewed and false idea about how us politics and law work. But even Europe needs to prepare. We need new immigration laws so we don’t get overwhelmed by US citizens fleeing their country only to impose the same values on us that destroyed their country.