• PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    So that way you have a say in which of the two viable choices (in most elections) are presented to the electorate?

    Unless you’re part of some locally competitive party that has primaries, in which case I understand.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I am a member if no party because I fundamentally disagree with political parties in first past the post electoral systems for the same reason I oppose communism. When it scales up a party makes it far too easy for the party leadership to abuse that power and institutionalizing that power means that positive change is more difficult to enact.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Registering for primaries at least when there are primary candidates that are prominently championing ranked-choice voting might be worth considering.

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Nope, the state Democratic party sucks and I don’t live in the one district that ever goes Democrat for state representative. All of our national stuff is Republicans and has been for decades.

          I only vote because we sometimes get elect a Democrat for a governor.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I am a member if no party because I fundamentally disagree with political parties in first past the post electoral systems for the same reason I oppose communism. When it scales up a party makes it far too easy for the party leadership to abuse that power and institutionalizing that power means that positive change is more difficult to enact.