• Iceblade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      We have way more resources and production available today to achieve an absolute amount of TWh. If anything, being able to acheive the same growth with Nuclear in the 70s and 80s is a much larger achievement when considering how much larger a portion of the total supply it represented.

      • Hugohase@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        I don’t agree with you but either way that doesn’t change the fact that nuclear is just slow, expensive and a bad idea in 2024.

        • PunnyName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          How is nuclear a bad idea? It’s one of the best options. Sure it’s slow and expensive, but once it’s up and running, it’s safe, and even less radioactive than coal.

          • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 days ago

            Because solar and wind can be deployed much faster. You rather easily have a decade of extra coal or gas emissions, if you built nuclear today.