This user posted AI images of Trump and got completely erased.

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 days ago

    Based on the text of their removed comments from the .world modlog, they deserved being banned even before the one that says they posted CSAM.

  • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 days ago

    Based on the modlog, I’m going to take an guess and say that the person in question posted an AI-generated image representing a fictitious but realistic child doing something sexual with an adult, and the removal entry doesn’t show in the modlog because it was purged.

    “Technically” this is not CSAM, but the difference does not matter here. No sane instance allows images depicting sex with children; doubly so if it can be reasonably confused with CSAM, like AI generated images can. So, if my guess is correct, the user deserved it.

    And, if my guess is wrong (it could be - I don’t know), the user still deserves a permaban, but under another reason: just look at the modlog. It boils down to the user assuming (i.e. making shit up, lying to know what they don’t) things about other users, so they can screech at them. Being an assumer on its own is already bad, but a combative assumer is even worse.

    • gidostro@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Still not the ban reason of CSAM. Sweep it under the rug and do it “for the children” sound like anyone you know?

      • TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        Dude… I saw that thread before it was deleted and it was 100% csam. It may not have happened IRL, but what those images depicted was csam. I wish i hadn’t seen them and I’m glad the admin took action. This isnt some puritanical conspiracy against free speech. Just because the images were AI generated and there was no nudity, doesnt mean they didnt depict child sexual abuse. Because they did.

  • misk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    4 comments in a minute and that’s just what we can see. There is no such thing as spamming fediverse for good or whatever your reasons are.