An emergency slide that fell off of a Delta passenger jet shortly after take-off last week reportedly turned up two days later outside the home of a lawyer whose firm is coincidently suing the Boeing plane manufacturer over safety issues.

Jake Bissell-Linsk, whose firm filed suit against Boeing after one of its planes lost a door plug mid-air back in January, said he discovered the deflated slide washed up outside his oceanfront home near New York City’s John F. Kennedy International Airport on Sunday.

“I didn’t want to touch it but I got close enough to get a close look at it,” he told The New York Post of the bizarre discovery along the shore of Belle Harbor, Queens.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        While I know you’re correct… And there is definitely going to be a media bias in reporting… There seems to have been a remarkably large number of issues with Boeing planes specifically lately.

        • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Shitting on Boeing is getting clicks. So the news keeps reporting on every bit of anything they can find related to them. The incident rate isn’t going up. At the same time there have been a few issues with Airbus planes but that’s not getting engagement as much so the news isn’t focusing on them.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not all Boeing planes are garbage, and they are the cornerstone of domestic air travel. If we suddenly stopped flying them, ticket prices would triple. We have a lot of airbuses and some aging McDonnell Douglas planes, but Boeing probably makes up about half of American passenger planes.

    • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why have they not grounded every car? Despite all the safety problems at boeing, they are still way safer than automobiles.

      • Quetzlcoatl@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Why have they not outlawed boats? Boats are safer than cars.

        Why havent we killed all the cobras? Cobras are safer than boats.

        Why havent we outlawed kitchen knives? Kitchen knives are safer than cobras.

        Am I doing this right? Its a fun game which deflects blame and changes the subject quite effectively.

        • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          “Am I doing this right?”

          No. You are inversing every statement that follows your questions. Why would we outlaw boats if they are safer than cars as you claim? Did you instead mean to say cars are safer than boats or ask why we haven’t outlawed cars? Rinse and repeat for the other pairings.

          E: You do realize you’re saying the exact opposite thing than the person you’re trying to mock, right?

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I know a few lawyers who are awesome.

            None of them are particularly rich. Two of them have spent 2 of the last 3 years at the southern border doing immigration cases (I’d say pro bono, but they get paid a pittance by the Feds…. Basically enough to cover a hotel room.)

      • Pronell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        They don’t like rich lawyers. Few do.

        But we do want lawyers skilled enough to be able to hurt major corporations, and then expect them to work cheap.

        It’s not all that hard to understand when you’re downtrodden. But it is a bit counterproductive in my opinion. (That aimed at the original commenter, not at you, though I am sympathetic to both viewpoints.)