• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I had a black and white version of this.

    All the games were basically the same apart from the target shooting game.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I wonder about the “Colour”. Did they actually use the different video outputs of the AY-3-8500 chip for controlling different colour signals instead just joining them as a luminance signal?

    For those too young to know: The AY-3-8500 (or AY-3-8500-1 fo NTSC) chip is at the heart of almost all of those pong-type consoles. It has a number of different (but synchronized) video outputs for left player, right player, ball, numbers, and playing field, and most consoles just or’ed them together into luminance (Y) to make a simple B&W image. You could route some signals to the R-Y and/or the B-Y signal to give them some basic color, e.g. if you sent the “ball” signal both to the luminance and the red (R-Y) channel, you would get a red ball. All this needs are a handful of simple logic gates.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It basically tells you that you can basically tone the “colourness” (i.e. the brightness of the colours) up and down, which was a normal control (like brightness and contrast) back then. This is not about being able to make a red playing field green by some setting on the TV. You just had some potentiometers to play with the pre-amplification of the luminance and colour signals.

        What could be in the instructions would an explanation of the games telling you that e.g. the playing field is green and the ball is red or somesuch, then they actually did a (rare) “colour implementation” of the circuit.

        If you are interested, there is a number of interesting documentations on this pong chip on the net.

    • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      22 hours ago

      The very first pong game system did not use software, which blows my mind. OP’s does not appear to be the same version but it’s possible this it also does not use software.

        • Treczoks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Start with googling “pong chip”. There is a Wikipedia article about it, and then look for the chips “name” AY-3-8500, under which you will find lots of information about this chip.

        • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It used transistor to Transistor logic or ttl, which means chips are wired together on the board to build the “code” and handle Inputs and Outputs, because affordable CPUs, ram or storage did not exist when the first arcades came out. However with more complex games this became increasingly expensive because each additional chip caused costs for parts, soldering work, warranty, potential failures during operation.

        • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          I can’t really give a great answer to that, pretty sure it was all just electrical hardware. I’m curious now, I’ll look around and let you know if I find something.

          Edit: yep, no code, just circuits. Here is the original circuit diagram from Atari

          • f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Many 80s games have an amusing hybrid design. Galaga has its game code and sprites in ROM, but has an entire custom chip that is a dedicated circuit for generating the ship explosion sound, another custom chip that only makes the scrolling starfield, etc.

        • thejbw@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Essentially the “program” was baked into the hardware design itself. It didn’t have a rom chip or something, it just had hardware circuits dedicated to each function, like drawing the paddle etc.

  • TimeNaan@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    It works but my polish PAL tv doesn’t seem to like it very much, it took a lot of tuning to get this wonderful image.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Unlikely. It is spelled “Colour” on the box, implying this would be for the UK market.

      • Redkey@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Found in an Edinburgh charity shop, so while it’s not impossible, it’s unlikely.

        EDIT: Also, an NTSC signal on a plain PAL TV would be black and white (not even false colours) even if you got an otherwise stable picture.

        It’s easy to forget, but these old systems didn’t connect to the TV with composite RCA connectors, but via RF. So we’re not just dealing with straight PAL, but with PAL over a broadcast system. Scotland was using PAL-I for broadcast, while Poland seems to have used a combination of PAL-D and PAL-K. Differences in channel ranges and bandwidths, and sound channel offsets, could make it difficult to tune a TV set designed for one system to a signal from another, especially if it’s a more modern set designed for automatic operation, as OP’s set appears to be.

        • Redkey@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          They probably did. It’s not exactly honest, but the system is technically outputting a colour signal, and it was released at a time when that wasn’t a given. They didn’t say “full colour” anywhere on the box, did they?

          Let’s call it a mix of lower expectations for the time, and a bit of marketing deception.

    • TimeNaan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Obviously but it is a Pong Console, it’s the category started by the original Pong.

      This one has a bunch of additional games too.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      we had an all black console that is like halfway between that the whats in the OP. it had wired controllers and 4 versions that you cycled through to choose. I think it was pong, doubles pong, hockey, doubles hockey. hockey being pong where you had to get it in the goal in the 20% of the middle of your opponents end but the other 80% was just like the side walls.

      • moopet@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I have a Binatone one in a crate here with essentially the same selection of games on it. It was a really common thing to clone, there was one chip that played them all.

    • TimeNaan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      No I mean it literally, it was wrapped in all the factory plastics and has literally zero wear and tear. It might have been taken out of the box and maybe used once or not at all.

        • Redkey@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          These “home pong” consoles were very common at the time. They don’t really do much, so their main value is historical interest, and this isn’t a particularly famous model. A quick eBay search seems to indicate it might go for GBP 80 at most, but probably more like GBP 20-40. So OP got a good deal, but they didn’t find a lost Vermeer. :)

        • TimeNaan@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Nah, it’s a cheap pong clone, it doesn’t have that much collector’s value. Also I can just pack everything back up, it wasn’t sealed just wrapped in plastic.