Anti-communist writers Jung Chang and Jon Halliday assert in their highly controversial 2006 book Mao: The Unknown Story that the Nationalist general Zhang Zhizhong was a Soviet agent who, following the Marco Polo Bridge incident in July 1937, had been tasked by Stalin with escalating the already tense situation with Japan into a full-scale, all-out war.

Stalin ordered this, Chang and Halliday maintain, because he (quite reasonably) feared Japanese aggression against his own country and wanted to draw China and Japan (both of which were hostile towards the USSR) into a costly war with one-another in order to weaken them both. This certainly was the approach he took towards Germany in 1939 after the failure of collective security, so it’s not without precedent (or postedent?). In addition, Zhang himself was a strong communist sympathiser who would later defect to Mao’s side during the Civil War and serve in his government.

According to Chang and Halliday, Zhang deliberately escalated the situation by orchestrating the Ōyama incident (the killing of two Japanese soldiers in Shanghai) and spreading misinformation to the media about the Japanese attacking the city. This was done in order to pressure Chiang into giving him the greenlight to attack the Japanese garrison there, as Chiang wasn’t nearly as gung ho about the whole idea.

The ensuing battle, in which over 700,000 Chinese troops faced off against 300,000 Japanese, saw the decimation of Chiang’s army. It resulted in the loss of hundreds of thousands of lives (including Chiang’s most elite German-trained troops) and the capture of both Shanghai and eventually Nanking.

What do you think? Is this some crazy crackpot idea invented to demonise Stalin, Mao, and communism as a whole; or might it have some basis in reality?

  • King_Simp@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I would need primary source evidence for this, but if there aren’t primary sources then it’s obviously false.

    However, if there are, I still disagree with the interpretation. I doubt it was some realpolitik scheme (entirely) to do this. It was more likely that if china did not engage the Japanese now, China would be conquered by the pen, rather than by the gun. Han Suyin (biographer of Mao Zedong and Zhou Enlai) talks in an interview about how Chiang was often very apprehensive about fighting japan. In all seriousness Chiang needed to be captured and have his head put to a chopping block for him to agree to the chinese united front. So, again assuming the basic information presented is true, it is more likely that Stalin encouraged the fight now. Also remember that the Japanese and Soviets were engaged in broader border skirmishes. Considering the value of the siberian (for some reason this said liberian, i hate auto correct) troops during the great patriotic war, Japan not being able to invade the previously take far Easterm areas was extremely important for the people of the world.