There’s a post about it.

That post explicitly says it’s not a place for debate or participation from users of other instances.

I’d like to respect that but I think events like this need debate and discussion because it helps to develop and evolve the culture of lemmy and the fediverse in general.

The post says:

This post is “FYI only” for blahaj lemmy members. It is not a debate, and is not intended for non blahaj lemmy users to weigh in and offer opinions.

I recently received reports of a feddit.uk user espousing transphobia. Specifically, this was a feddit.uk user refusing to use the word cis, repeating the “adult human female” dog whistle, and claiming that trans women are not women. I approached a member of the feddit.uk admin team and raised my concerns and sought clarification of their stance on posts like this, where the transphobia is mostly dogwhistles, and “civil disagreement” on the validity of trans folk.

I was told by the feddit.uk admin that their preferred response is this kind of transphobia is to “sort it out through discussion and voting”. However, the comments in question are currently more upvoted than downvoted, and little “sorting out” has occurred. The posts remain in place.

At this point, the admin stopped responding to my messages despite being active elsewhere on lemmy. When it became clear they were ignoring my messages and had no intention of removing the posts in question, I made the decision to defederate the instance.

I know some folk agree with the feddit.uk admins approach of pushback through discussion and voting, but this instance is not designed to be that kind of space. Blahaj lemmy is meant to be a place where we can avoid the rampant transphobia universally visible on nearly every other social media platform, and where we can exist without needing to debate our right to do so.

  • FelixCress@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    It’s not because Ada is doing anything wrong

    Banning people who were never active on your instance and applying pressure on other instances to ban users is nothing wrong?

    I am all for trans rights (see my recent post about nonsensical UK supreme Court judgement) and this is not the way to support these.

    • flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      You keep saying it over and over but the downvotes and the vast majority of replies every single time you complain disagree.

      Remind me, how did that post of yours here go? Was it… -18? Were the comments overwhelmingly telling you to stuff it? Sure seems that way.

      And yet all you do is continue to say the same garbage over and over. You’re allowed to say that this isn’t how you support trans people. But the people of blahaj disagree. You can complain that this is power tripping. But the people of YPTB disagree. You can whine that legitimate complaints are being silenced on YPTB. But the people of dbzer0 disagree. Which is why we asked to put a stop to the “waaa I was banned by Ada” posts.

      • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        25 minutes ago

        But the people of YPTB disagree.

        That’s not true. The first post by HAL-5700X is at +29 / - 56, so about a third agree.

        Kolanaki’s following statement:

        Defederating an entire instance over the actions of a single user instead of simply banning that user along with creating a post to bring it up but not actually discuss it is just the kind of extreme reaction I expect from Ada.

        is at +33 / -29 and that’s without the text that prompted the defederation being revealed in this thread.

        https://sh.itjust.works/post/36737764/18213591

        If the text was available, chances are the reaction might have been very different.

        Even FauxLiving’s posts stating the following (exert, not the full post) is at +18 / - 30.

        Blahj is a problem instance.

        The important distinction here is that they’re not simply trying to moderate their communities. They’re free to moderate their communities for their users. They want to push their rules on other instances.

        They’re not free to dictate to the greater social media space the acceptable policies on discourse. Their admins are constantly trying to enforce their ban lists on other servers and communities (or else, you see what happened to feddit.uk).

        A large minority of YPTB aren’t aligned with your opinion.

        • flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 minutes ago

          I can cherry pick shit too!

          Like db0 saying “Good decision by Ada” which is up 61, down 2! Or Noel_Skum, “How are people still struggling with the basic concept that the person who runs Blahaj can do what they want with Blahaj?” Up 54, down 1! Or pixeltree, “That’s why I chose blahaj zone as my instance. It’s nice not having to justify my existence” Or southsamurai! Or LWD! Or me!

          Fuck off out of here with that disingenuous garbage.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 minutes ago

          🔥

          Also, just want to mark it down that we can still rely on up vote down vote numbers. Enjoy it while it lasts once threat actors arrive, it is gonna be reddit astroturf

          • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 minutes ago

            Not sure what you are referring to.

            I am pointing out that there is a decent amount of pushback, but in voting and comments. The framing that the whole (or even an overwhelming majority) of YPTB is aligned with a single view is factually incorrect.