Update: Mindless downvotes will be taken as evidence that degrowthers (of which I am one) are not capable of defending their ideas. What’s the point of a community where one only sees things that confirm one’s biases? I don’t get it. Maybe this lazy tribal attitude helps explain why degrowth is so deeply unpopular.
This seems as good a presentation as we’ll get of the case against degrowth. Namely that it’s a political loser, the environment be damned. People in this community probably want to read things they already agree with (update - they sure do). I’d say we’d do better by first taking seriously the arguments of the other side. Which appear quite solid, to the point that it’s hard to know how to go about countering them.
Some choice excerpts:
Most Americans care deeply about building wealth: Roughly 79 percent describe their money as “extremely” or “very” important to them. Eighty-four percent say there’s “nothing wrong” with trying to make as much money as possible […]
In 2024 […] Trump made major gains in large, immigrant-rich urban counties, where service-sector employment is dominant. […] Why did these previously stalwart Democrats break for Trump? Because they are all upwardly mobile groups, for whom pocket-book issues are central. More than progressive pandering, they want the opportunity to participate in the American dream—and Trump seemed to promise that. […]
To their credit, some liberals have tried to fill the void created by this anti-capitalist conservatism. The Atlantic’s Derek Thompson and his co-author, Ezra Klein, have pushed for an “abundance” liberalism in their new book […] [W]e now have two major parties infected by the gospel of no-wealth. Both parties embrace, in Klein and Thompson’s phrasing, a “scarcity” mindset rather than an “abundance” mindset.
The discussion I wanted to have (unrealistically, yes) was over what might be a winning response to the argument presented. Because it’s a powerful one, it’s very clearly in the ascendant, and I care about how best to counter it. Apparently you do not.
Well what brought you to degrowth? Why do you see the argument against degrowth convincing or powerful? Why do haven’t you turned your back on degrowth because of the argument? If it’s just that some people have that view and you want to evangelize, I’ve got some bad news for you about changing people’s viewpoints with rhetoric. I don’t need your answers to these questions (though feel free to write them out if that helps), but they might be a good spot to start from to find something that will resonate a bit more or be more useful to you.
Anyway, I’m checking out. Cheers.