Steam revenue estimated 2024: $10.8B

Google Play Store gaming revenue 2024: ~$31B

Why doesn’t Valve want a part of that? I mean they already have an Android app. Several, actually. I realize there’s some amount of investment but surely the payoff is worth it, and they have the necessary funds and skills? I mean if F-Droid can do it with nothing but volunteers and grants…?

Certainly plenty of games won’t lend themselves well to the mobile experience but also plenty of them do.

From a personal perspective: I don’t really care a whole lot for mobile games but I do like Balatro and want to play it on my phone, but if I want to do that I have to buy another license, which I can’t even do because I don’t run Google Play Services.

Epic got in on this already. Where’s Valve?


Edit: my reflections on this conversation:

Valve could distribute their own app like Epic but they’d also probably have to remove it from the Play Store because now a cross-platform game would give them an Android version, thus breaking Google’s ToS. So would doing such a thing outweigh lost sales from the Google version, and would it impact customer satisfaction? I wonder how many people are actually purchasing PC games in the Steam Android app…?

  • Ulrich@feddit.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    If they start allowing users to install android games, Google is going to stop them from having anything useful in their play store app.

    They would have to distribute it independently. Google would have no say in the matter.

    what would Steam do if they started getting android-only games being submitted. Or mobile-quality games dominating their store?

    …cash their checks? I don’t understand the question. That’s the point.

    it might be something they’ve discussed but they would have rather focused on steam deck-type gaming for mobile.

    perhaps an ARM-based steam OS+steamdeck approach would make more sense

    …why not both?

    Although Valve seems to like staying in their lane so that seems like the most likely explanation.

    • UnbrokenTaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      They would have to distribute it independently. Google would have no say in the matter.

      That’s exactly my point. The current app lets you buy PC games despite being distributed through the store. If you can buy Android games on it, well, I doubt Google will ignore it. And even if Google was okay with it, there’s no way to easily communicate to users who start using the app there that they need to download another app from a website.

      I’m not saying it’s a bad idea. I’m just saying I think there are reasons they haven’t done it (yet?). I think they certainly must have considered it. I’ve certainly been wondering about it for a long while too.

      why not both?

      Sure. I would assume they would do it the same way as steam deck, where that’s the priority. The wide variety of phone specs on the market might have an impact on how they could support it etc.

      • Ulrich@feddit.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        That’s exactly my point. The current app lets you buy PC games despite being distributed through the store.

        And they could continue doing so while also distributing a separate app independently that allows you to buy Android games.

        Notice if you try to buy a movie from Amazon on Google TV they redirect you to the website. They could do the same or redirect you to the non-Google version.

        I’m just saying I think there are reasons they haven’t done it (yet?)

        I agree, I just find it very curious what those reasons are.