• Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Their road tax should be based on engine/volume/passenger capacity.

    If you need it for work get a commercial.

    • TON618@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      A transit or sprinter makes much more sense for commercial use in the vast majority of professions as the cargo space to vehicle ratio is much higher and you can lock the whole thing up.

      The only profession so far I’ve seen where they make some kind of sense is for landscapers, and even that’s debatable considering you can get sprinters with an open bed that is much larger then what’s on these pickups.

      • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Not to forget that many vans have an okay towing capacity, so you can just use a trailer.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Your not towing anything with the smaller transits. And they suck in winter.

          • Squizzy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Man Ive pulled literal tons of cable for 100s of KMs with those, the NV400, the traffic and vivaro. Winter times down to the back of the beyonds. Mind you our winters are wet not the coldest.

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I’m genuinely not aware of a single country that takes vehicle volume into road tax calculations, but that sounds like a damn great idea