• littleblue✨@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Or, you know, none of that bullshit? We could just let it slip back into the primordial muck with superstition and shitting into our bare hands… But, no. We like our invisible sky daddies and not being collectively intelligent. 🫥

    • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Say this when it’s a country’s primary religion on the line, not when some minorities want equal rights for their religions.

      • littleblue✨@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        No. Say it always for all religion. Fuck the entire system of mind control. Don’t cherry pick your oppressors, citizen.

        • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Unless the country’s primary religion is on the line, you are not going against all religion - you are going against the specific religion in question (or religions). Systems resit change, so if you advocate for “let’s not give this minority’s religion equal rights, and instead take away the rights of the primary religion” only the first part will get implemented.

          Analogy: Whenever there is a talk about legalizing same sex marriage, someone will always argue that the state should not get involved in any kind of marriage. Does this position have merit on on its own? Yes. But when presented in the contest of same sex marriage legalization, is it anything but pure support of continuing the oppression of same sex couples?