• atomic peach@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m not sure I understand the need for charging to play media on a private server when not on the local network. Why is this no longer going to be free? I’m glad I bought a lifetime pass many many years back but I definitely wouldn’t pay for Plex nowadays with alternatives being comparable. What a silly choice they made~

    • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      It reeks of “we’re routing your traffic through our own servers to check your media for piracy” to me.

      • fakeplastic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Why would they check for piracy when it’s not them you’re pirating from and stopping piracy would remove the most popular use case of their product?

      • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        They do have a proxy service, but it is optional. I have it disabled because my server is faster.

        I could see the proxy slipping behind a paywall as that feature has costs, but web accessibility? That’s basic function of a video server.

        • Kairos@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          The proxy service is also encrypted end to end

          Edit: this relies on the Plex system being secure/nice though.

    • thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’m not defending them because it’s a shit move, but they clearly understand the most valuable feature is not their ad-ridden free content but rather the original value prop of the service to make it easy to share personal media with small groups of friends.