Cross posted from Discuit

  • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Yup, because the burden of proof is on the one who made the claim. But that only allows us to say the text is not necessarily true.

    When you say the op is lying, that’s a new claim, where the burden of proof is on you.

      • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        …although, because selling a house ASAP if you have a loan with large payments for it, is the only logical course of action if long-term unemployment is assumed, nothing to that extent has been demonstrated.

              • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Uh, then I am sorry for the misunderstanding.

                I have been trying to convince you that you should find some argument that actually holds water, or stop playing that your argument is sound.

                In any case, you asked me to make my point, so here goes: Nothing in the post gives you enough data to claim that it’s a lie. You can say that the claim sounds implausible to you, but you cannot outright tell that it’s a falsehood, unless there is a reason to think so. And you say the reason to think so is that someone was doing the only logical thing, and you say – for whatever reason – that it’s extremely rare to do the most logical thing in such a situation.

                It’s funny how you keep dodging everything I say :)