Summary

A massive Ukrainian drone strike targeted Russian oil refineries and infrastructure, including Moscow’s largest refinery, which supplies 50% of the city’s fuel.

The attack also hit the Druzhba pipeline control station, halting Russian oil exports to Hungary. With over 337 drones striking multiple regions, the operation exploited gaps in Russia’s air defenses.

Hungary, heavily reliant on Russian energy, called the pipeline attack a threat to its sovereignty.

Analysts suggest continued strikes could pressure Russia’s economy and energy dominance, potentially influencing ceasefire negotiations.

    • alkbch@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, they don’t. Ukraine is about to get kicked out from Kursk and lose the little leverage they had in the negotiations.

      • perestroika@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        Cards are ever-changing, but the main card of both sides is possibly agreeing to stop, if certain conditions are satisfied.

        If Ukrainians could have stayed in Kursk, it would have been something to trade back during negotiations. But apparently, Putin didn’t like that prospect and made Russian troops concentrate a lot of force in Kursk. This force came at the expense of other fronts. During the time Russia was bombing Russian territory, it spent less energy bombing Ukraine.

        I don’t think Ukrainians are very cheerful about losing Kursk, but it was meant as a distraction - this direction was weakly defended, they got in easily, stayed for six months, just the coming back out turned ugly.

        • drhodl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          20 hours ago

          They only withdrew because US stopped intelligence sharing. Unlike Pootang the Tinyman, President Z wants his soldiers to survive.

        • alkbch@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          That’s right, Ukrainians wanted to use Kursk to trade against something else during the negotiations; soon they might not be able to do that anymore.

      • Siegfried@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Good job russia, they finally achieved something… like 6 months later… and with the ukrainians leaving on their own… but we have to give them something, right?

        Fuck russia

          • drhodl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 day ago

            The loss of American support and intelligence sharing, exposed their soldiers to greater risks, so they performed a tactical withdrawal. Had it been ruzzia in that situation, they’d have just let their soldiers die, and sent more in to die also.

            • alkbch@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              American support and intelligence has only been paused for one week and has resumed since.

              • drhodl@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 day ago

                Did you forget you already said this a minute ago, Yuri? Damn but that anti-freeze vodka sure does hit hard, hey? :)

            • perestroika@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              23 hours ago

              Sadly, the situation was considerably more dire.

              In Kursk, at the end, Ukrainian troops (about 12 000 men) were supplied using a single good road. Russia brought in enough offensive power (about 70 000 men) to push on that road, and despite heavy losses, reached artillery and drone range. Russia then relocated some of their best droners to the area (both countries have elite drone units with better equipment and experience) and started attacking nearly every supply vehicle that they could. Logistics broke down.

              Then Trump pulled the intel and HIMARS strikes ceased for a while.

              As a result, the Ukrainian contingent in Kursk received orders to do an orderly retreat. But they received them late. In reality, they had to save themselves using rather ungraceful methods, often abandoning vehicles (bridge was blown up) and moving on foot.

              The Kursk offensive helped distract Russia more than a little, but shouldn’t have ended that way. I’m fairly certain ISW will write in detail about the Kursk events in their next review of developments, but the lesson as it appears to me: “retreat before your movement routes come under fire”.

              As for long range strike drones, Ukrainians have some of the best in the world, and they’re working hard with them. Also, recently, what appeared to be an Ukrainian cruise missile circumnavigated Crimea and hit an oil depot south of the peninsula. Which means 1000+ km of cruise missile range. Moscow needs only around 700 km.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        Do you think invading a sovereign country is ok? What are your thoughts on bombing childrens’ hospitals?

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            1 day ago

            Sure. Ukraine is retreating from the Kursk region, with minimal losses. Holding dirt doesn’t win wars. Meanwhile they’re making huge wins in east (not a ton of dirt, but destroying assets and soldiers), and these strikes into Russia on very strategically important assets.

            • alkbch@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Thank you for confirming Ukrainian soldiers are getting kicked out from Kursk.

              • drhodl@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                1 day ago

                Ukrainians are withdrawing gracefully, probably due to Drumph ceasing all intelligence sharing. Had the ruzzians been in that situation, they’d have just let their soldiers die. Why aren’t YOU at the front, comrade?

                • alkbch@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  American support and intelligence has only been paused for one week and has resumed since.

                  Same question back to you, comrade.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                1 day ago

                I don’t know if you buy this, but Ukraine says it’s part of the plan. That sounds like what Russia says. If you don’t believe them, why do you believe what Russia says?

                • alkbch@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I don’t believe that withdrawing from Kursk because the Russians are gaining ground day after day is part of some sort of grand plan.

                  • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    I don’t exactly either. You ignored half my comment. Do you believe it when Russia says similar things? If so, why? Ukraine has an image they need to sell, but it’s even more important for Russia, so don’t believe them either.

                  • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    The Russia has not been gaining ground after early 2022. During the year 2024 they gained more ground than anybody in the west expected, because USA stopped its weapon deliveries for 6 months in the end of June 2024.

                    When the Russia gained ground exceptionally fast, it gained 0.7 % of Ukraine’s total territory in that one year. Less than a percent. Okay, technically that is indeed gaining ground, but in the big picture of the war that’s an irrelevant amount. If the Russia manages to gain 5 % of Ukraine’s territory in 12 months, it’s okay to say they are gaining ground. But with the speed they are “advancing” now… Heh.

                    The Russia gaining ground at a speed of 0.7 % of Ukraine’s territory and losing 400 000 soldiers as dead and wounded per year in the process is indeed part of some grand plan of Ukraine’s. The Russia won’t run out of people with that pace for another 250 years or so, but it will run out of soldiers, because it is losing them faster than it’s able to recruit new ones.

            • alkbch@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Sure, do you have a source from this past week claiming Ukraine is not losing ground in Kursk?

              • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 day ago

                I don’t think he can have. He knows Ukraine has been losing ground in Kursk. But he also understands that this is not really relevant at this point. The Russia has not been advancing in any noticeable manner since early 2022. (Okay, in 2024 they did gain 0.7 % percent of Ukraine’s total territory in just one year, but I would not call gaining under one percent of a country’s territory advancing, really)

                It would be useful for Ukraine to remain in the Kursk area, but what can you do when all your warehouses’ and military bases’ locations in the area are suddenly known by your enemy? It’s a huge task building new ones in different places, and one cannot do so in just a couple of days.

                • alkbch@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Russia has been gaining ground steadily.

                  Ukraine is about to be kicked out of Kursk.

                  I have no satisfaction nor happiness while wearing this, it is just the unfortunate truth.

                  • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    And the Russia will remain gaining ground at the same steady speed of 0.7 percent per year. In just 7 years, by 2032, they will already have conquered another one twentieth of Ukraine! Ura!

                    If the Russia keeps its ground gaining steady and does not increase its speed tenfold, then that means the Russia is doing seriously badly. Losing 400 000 soldiers in a year (as dead and wounded, not only dead!) and not managing to unsteady that rate of advance means things are seriously going badly!

      • Melchior@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        What part of the US did the Taliban conquer to exchange it for the US to leave the country?

          • drhodl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            How about the soviet ruzzian invasion of Afghanistan, before that? You ruzzians sure are great at losing. Maybe that’s why Drumph loves Pootang the Tiny so much :) You should stick to things you’re good at, like consuming anti-freeze vodka and wife beating, hey?

            • alkbch@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Because many people in Crimea and in the eastern regions actually want to be under Russian influence.

              • Fluke@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                1 day ago

                That would be the Russians sent there to cause trouble as “separatists” right?

                  • drhodl@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    I hear ruzzian colonists have been fleeing back to mainland ruzzia from Crimea, Yuri. That doesn’t seem good for ruzzia’s future in that area :)

              • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                And there are ways for them to get that. For instance, about 200,000 Afghans resided or immigrated to America between 2000 and 2021. What was stopping those in Crimea from doing the same? And we haven’t even addressed if that “many” is actually a majority.

                • alkbch@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  The opposite is happening, people who want to remain under Ukrainian influence are moving to the regions still under Ukrainian control.

                  • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    13
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    What I heard was, “The people who don’t want to be under Russian influence or live under wartime conditions are moving to the regions that aren’t engaged in military occupation.”

                  • drhodl@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Is that because of the ruzzians so kindly setting up a removalist service, with all the trimmings, Yuri? That’s a /s by the way. The fact is ruzzians are stealing any children they can get their foul grubby paws on. Any males are being forcibly conscripted to fight against their own people. Lord knows what those vile animals do with the women… Ruzzians are orcs in vaguely human shape. Their supporters are even worse.

              • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 day ago

                Anybody in Crimea knows that if you say Crimea is Ukraine, you will quite soon get beaten up seriously badly. A person cannot know whether you will rat him out or not, so It does not matter what he thinks – he will absolutely say that he supports the Russia. Practically everybody in Crimea will say that they do, no matter what they think.