• 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Hey, you most likely weren’t raised vegan, too. I’d also argue that to oppose suffering, you have to give individuals (i.e./that is people) some sort of worth, but then most killing doesn’t check out.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Naw, I know some people with negative worth who still shouldn’t be suffering. In fact, I’m pretty sure they’re suffering from their lack of worth. This is a matter of ethics, not value.

        • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Those might be suffering from lack of self-worth, but making difference between people’s worth opens up a can of ethical mold. Misanthropy is one thing, but the value of human life is untouchable.

          • Mango@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            No, that attitude is simple evolutionary pressure to stay alive. The value of a human is no different from the value of a cow ethically, and I’ll eat cow. I don’t want either to suffer. Some people are economically far less valuable than cows.

            • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Cultural evolution > Social Darwinism

              Do you eat human? From a “farm”? Or shot “in the wild”?

              Right to exist is not touched by effort.

              Do you know what would reduce suffering for both cow and human?