• ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    Let’s get lab grown meat going so we can free up all that cattle land in the middle of the country, build some well planned cities with high speed rail connecting them and spread out a bit.

    • OsaErisXero@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Land is not, and will not for the forseeable future be the point of contention in the US, it’s the rail connections and building ‘well planned cities’ that people actually want to live in that are basically impossible.

        • Moneo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          The point is that we already have tons of cities that are way too sprawly. Adding more cities is way harder than retrofitting the ones we have.

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            How would building a modern city in an open plain be harder than retrofitting a century (or more) old city, wrt transit, zoning, ecological concerns, etc?

            I’m not saying it’s trivial to build a city. I’m saying a modern city does not jeed to work around the many many layers of complexity and existing city brings

              • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                No, sprawl would be adding suburban surrounds. Dense urban area is dense.

                Modern well built cities networked by robust mass transit would decrease the need to take up natural and agriculture land.

                I don’t care how many modern cities you add, suburban infrastructure around existing poorly built cities is worse.