• john89@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Right. There’s no one in prison for violence against commoners.

    • mmcintyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s some after the fact shit. After the commoners were already violated, because the cops won’t or can’t and definitely have no interest in protecting them.

      How many are in prison for violence against the powerful?

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Police can’t follow everyone around 24/7. Are you saying there are no instances of police protecting commoners from violence?

        Also, are you trying to argue that we shouldn’t have police to imprison people “after the fact?” You think these people should just get to roam free?

          • john89@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Why are you getting so mad?

            I’m asking you questions. If it’s not what you think or what happened, then say so.

            • mmcintyre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              If someone goes to jail for violence against me, I haven’t been protected from violence. That’s literally all I’m saying. Why are you putting random words in my mouth and asking me questions about that shit?

              • john89@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Calm down, again.

                Without the threat of imprisonment, can you understand that more people would be willing to commit acts of violence?