Electric cars are not THE solution.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 days ago

    There is no alternative suggested. The purpose of this movement is to tax heavy EVs. I think that makes it distraction.

    The smaller the EV the more range per kwh, and so smaller batteries are needed which makes them more affordable. It is not unreasonable to tax heavy vehicles, but the punch line that motivates this piece is “EV’s bad”. They could have recommended micromobility for example.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      imho we should tax any vehicle that puts an inordinate strain on the roads. ultra-heavy EV’s like cybertrucks and hummers are ridiculous and inefficient, and the purchases knew it when they bought them.

      but also the cummins diesel powered pavement princess my colleague drives BY THEMSELVES TO THEIR OFFICE JOB day after day, I think that should have to pay an excise tax.

      work vehicles certainly deserve cutouts, but they need to be work appropriate vehicles, not just jacked up asshole haulers.

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        work vehicles certainly deserve cutouts

        That thinking is what got us SUVs. Work vehicles earn income, and so probably don’t need cutouts.

    • Sonori@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It would be funny though if some environmentalist managed to make the tax properly technology agnostic though. Mostly if you can keep them from being exempted anything that hurts EVs goes double for pickups.

      Of course we both know gas cars get exempted whenever this sort of thing passes because it’s never actually about vehicle weight and road wear so much as how can we slow the decline in gasoline demand for a few years, but it’s nice to imagine that silver lining.