No, the algorithms are always there - otherwise, there is no “feed”. It’s just that the algorithms here have no hidden weights to drive engagement towards specific topics/posts. Not that it can’t still be manipulated, but that’s often detectable behind the scenes, too.

My brain broke a little bit your statement was so stupid. So, unfortunately, I’m sure you’re 100% correct.

The level of just utterly batshit insanity they’ll go to just to avoid doing anything to actually help people. I mean god forbid we just improve the fucking standard of living to reduce unrest, no, as you said, they’ll start tasing children instead. Fucking literally.

Trump figured out long ago how to abuse the legal system. Fuckwad has never filed a legitimate lawsuit in his entire life, and has probably sued more people than anyone else in history.

Just for you, Jeff, I’m pushing every single walk button I see, especially when I’m not crossing the road.

No

Oh like they care.

No, it’s far more crass: destroying the book makes scanning easier and faster.

Well, you don’t have to give government the authority to murder to sentence this jackass to be incarcerated in general population, as another commenter pointed out.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

No, you’re worse. Being better at lying about it earns you nothing, loser.

With how many corporations have merged, they don’t care anymore. They’ll risk the loss because they can pivot to a different brand in their conglomerate.

On anything that matters, try and buy local. The smaller the company, the less they can ignore risks like you mention.

Or does it slow down when you look back?

So somebody told kegsbreath as a prank to see how far he’d take it? I mean, that’s now my head canon regardless of what actually happened.

So?

Yes

Exactly. And the implication that this shit is otherwise benevolent just pisses me right the fuck off.

Yeah, I’m so done hearing about crime reduction by making examples of people.

It’s an asinine perversion of logic to even consider that argument.

You honestly think Singapore considers themselves… “civilized”?

We can all see you starting down your nose. And we know you have no science to contribute here…

You’re the one coming up short is my point.

OK, that part was simple enough. And yeah, language involves some fascinating math, actually, so it kinda makes sense as a category for generative or predictive algorithms or what have you.

And LLM is large language model? As opposed to a “language model”, which I figure is the same mathematical principles but smaller scale?