Well do are not able to translate sipreme curt correctly and u oversee on purpose what the article says. Its not nessasary when u have to drive “snake lines” so its common sense not driving at hogh risk. It contains also, that u have to leave a certain distance witch is not possible in that case. If there is enough space u have to drive to the right lane.
And ur wording shows what kind of person u are so i dont give a fuck for what u feel shame.
Ich hab geschrieben: “In Germany it is legal to drive in the middle lane if there’s at least infrequent slower traffic on the right.”
Der ADAC hat geschrieben: “Autofahrende dürfen bei einer dreispurigen Straße den mittleren Fahrstreifen allerdings dann durchgängig befahren, wenn rechts davon hin und wieder Fahrzeuge unterwegs sind.”
From time to time isnt a clearly definied term, so that would revoke the rechtsfahrgebot in General. It has this too: it should prevent risky laneswaps. If u want to understand it that way, it explains why they print on pizzas: remove the packaging before putting in the oven. That would explain why the afd gets so many votes and is a public critism to our schoolsystem.
Oh hello mr officer, yeah its absolutly ok to block the midlane, ive saw a car there before three hours and in the next 6 hours i expect another one. There was this idiot on feddit who said its ok when there is a car FROM TIME TO TIME.
The supreme court has no power here and its stil illegal: https://www.adac.de/verkehr/recht/verkehrsvorschriften-deutschland/rechtsfahrgebot/ u can translate this site, its the biggest carclub in Germany
Removed by mod
Well do are not able to translate sipreme curt correctly and u oversee on purpose what the article says. Its not nessasary when u have to drive “snake lines” so its common sense not driving at hogh risk. It contains also, that u have to leave a certain distance witch is not possible in that case. If there is enough space u have to drive to the right lane.
And ur wording shows what kind of person u are so i dont give a fuck for what u feel shame.
Ok, noch mal zum Mitschreiben:
Ich hab geschrieben: “In Germany it is legal to drive in the middle lane if there’s at least infrequent slower traffic on the right.”
Der ADAC hat geschrieben: “Autofahrende dürfen bei einer dreispurigen Straße den mittleren Fahrstreifen allerdings dann durchgängig befahren, wenn rechts davon hin und wieder Fahrzeuge unterwegs sind.”
Das ist eins zu eins das Gleiche.
Hast du’s jetzt verstanden?
No its not. Infrequent means some cars from time to time and thats in fact not the same.
Wie sagt man “from time to time” auf Deutsch?
Genau: “Hin und wieder”.
Was hat noch mal der ADAC geschrieben?
Oh, ja, “Hin und wieder”.
From time to time isnt a clearly definied term, so that would revoke the rechtsfahrgebot in General. It has this too: it should prevent risky laneswaps. If u want to understand it that way, it explains why they print on pizzas: remove the packaging before putting in the oven. That would explain why the afd gets so many votes and is a public critism to our schoolsystem.
Ok, so now your source isn’t good enough for you, because you know better than the ADAC. Gotcha.
Ok thats the dumbest thing ive ever red.
Oh hello mr officer, yeah its absolutly ok to block the midlane, ive saw a car there before three hours and in the next 6 hours i expect another one. There was this idiot on feddit who said its ok when there is a car FROM TIME TO TIME.
Pls just answer when ure back in reality.