• palordrolap@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Charging the recipient for insufficient postage has always been the policy of the British postal service. These fraudulent stamps have thus been included in with that policy because as far as they’re concerned a fraudulent stamp is as good as no stamp at all.

      Anything with insufficient postage is held at the sorting office closest to the recipient and a note is posted (ironic, no?) to the recipient telling them to come and pay the postage if they want it.

      The reasons they’ve backed down this time are 1) their newfangled bar code stamps have failed to stop the very forgery they were designed to prevent, and 2) public outcry causing them (the postal service, not the stamps) to reluctantly admit that this whole thing might, maybe, uh, perhaps just a little bit, be their fault.

      • Dkarma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        “British postal service has always been this stupid”

        What a reason to maintain status quo

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The only people who like the RM the way it is is the government. Everyone else would be quite happy for it to go back into public ownership. But for once they’re not actually at fault here. Charging the recipient is just how it works.

          • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah the Australian Post is fucked here too.

            Lose shit can’t do anything and is a bloated government service that can’t do its job.

            Privatisation would fix so much right up until they’re the only carrier and we pay through the nose for post.

            Better yet post as a subscription service would he the way it would go if it went private.

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              What happened here is basically the private company that took over didn’t care because they had no competition. They were also incredibly corrupt and evil which didn’t help but they also didn’t do basic maintenance and stuff on the infrastructure so everything fell apart.

              It all works as long as the government actually puts money into public services but every now and then you get one that seems to think that the solution to a tiny bit of debt is to spend no money at all, on anything.

              • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yeah governments hate debt but don’t realise the entire world runs in debt.

                You just need to manage it correctly. Further on that though, governments shouldn’t make a fucking dollar. They’re not for profit businesses they should all run at exactly zero