Most (if not all) color printer makers are printing unique tracking dots on every printed page. But some of them are transparent about it and disclose it to consumers.¹

In any case, in the mid-1980s Xerox and Canon developed the anti-consumer feature decades before it became known to the public in 2004. So certainly we can blame them for surreptitiously assaulting our privacy.

It’s the surreptitious element of this that is the most infuriating. Transparently disclosing the feature to consumers is the socially responsible approach because at least informed consumers know they are signing up for:

  • reduction of print quality
  • higher cost of consumables (more yellow consumption)
  • loss of privacy
  • inability to print a black document when yellow ink/toner is empty

Xerox and Canon should be boycotted not just for the anti-consumer feature but for concealing it.

¹ citation needed… I don’t recall where I read that some printer makers are transparent about it. I would like to know which ones are transparent just from a standpoint of knowing where the integrity is.

Update- other threads on this topic:

  • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafeEnglish
    1·
    23 days ago

    I recently had to mail a certified doc to an organization that simply can’t afford to migrate to digital - they only need these kinds of docs a few times a year.

    Are you going to pay to develop the systems for them, and perform all the testing, training, and manage the backup for them?

    Right. You don’t know what you’re talking about.