China has become a powerhouse in electric vehicles. Its automaker BYD recently topped Tesla in global EV sales, with Elon Musk warning of Chinese carmakers, “If there are no trade barriers established, they will pretty much demolish most other car companies in the world. They’re extremely good.”

On Friday, the Alliance for American Manufacturing sounded the alarm, issuing a report entitled: “On a Collision Course: China’s Existential Threat to America’s Auto Industry and its Route Through Mexico.”

The report, which lists policy recommendations to combat overcapacity and unfair trade practices, notes that BYD is building factories in Thailand and Hungary designed to be regional export hubs. It then adds:

“More alarming, however, are Chinese firms’ heavy spending on plants in Mexico, through which they can access the United States by way of the more favorable tariffs under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). This strategy is, in effect, an effort to gain backdoor access to American consumers by circumventing existing policies that are keeping China’s autos out of the U.S. market.”

  • solarvector@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I keep seeing articles about how US car companies and car rental corps are backing off from EVs due to lack of demand.

    So, which is it? Worried there might actually be demand if there are reasonably priced alternatives?

      • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Naw. You already have the people who really want to be in EVs. You have to convince the rest.

        PHEV is what Americans actually want.

        Pure electric most days, no range issues for long trips, more power in sports cars.

        • deezbutts@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Hard disagree.

          I’d love to save on gas and maintenance but there’s no affordable EVs for a family of 5. I’m not spending 50k+ on a Hyundai crossover.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    If US automakers are so expensive that they cannot compete, they cannot compete. As simple as that.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Chinese workers make like $900 USD a month. It’s why everything they make is cheaper to make. All the parts that they manufacture that would be assembled in Mexico are made by people making $600 a month, and now the assemblers in Mexico will be getting around $800 a month.

      I don’t think we should even be allowing imports of vehicles through Mexico from companies that aren’t Mexican. Same for anywhere else (including US assembling vehiclesin Mexico and sending them to US for sale). Then I also think the tarrifs should offset all the labor costs from parts, manufacturing, and assembly, minus true cost to have vehicles shipped.

      The US labor force shouldn’t get left to the dust because we need more than $800 a month to have a fair wage. Imports need balanced out to totally offset costs so anyone making a vehicle doesn’t have to go the cheapest labor route/country to win. Keep the competition fair so people in the US can keep jobs.

      • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        You know…if we taxed a few folks to stave off the world’s first trillionaires, we could maybe afford something like UBI, and it’d be easier to compete.

        Or, we could use the ever-increasing profit margins we see every quarter to invest in workers instead of investing in investing so we could pay a decent wage without making a car cost as much as a house should.

        We won’t do either. Instead, we’ll start another trade war and make a surprised Pikachu face when that makes everything yet more expensive.