Paul@lemmy.esquiretheduke.nohost.me to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 days agoWhy the White House is behind a rare Supreme Court push to limit gun ownershiptheweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square87linkfedilinkarrow-up1275file-text
arrow-up1275external-linkWhy the White House is behind a rare Supreme Court push to limit gun ownershiptheweek.comPaul@lemmy.esquiretheduke.nohost.me to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 days agomessage-square87linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarexyzzy@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up49·10 days agoFascist regimes eventually come for the guns
minus-squareemmy67@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·10 days agoFascist regimes always come for guns. Governments that come for guns are not always fascist A implies b, but b does not imply a.
minus-squarexyzzy@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up6·10 days agoIs your assertion that this is not a fascist regime? Otherwise you simply repeated what I said in the first sentence.
minus-squareemmy67@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 days agoNo, my assertion is that a government coming for your guns is not the reason it’s fascist
minus-squarexyzzy@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 days agoThat’s fine, I agree, but that’s not what I said
minus-squareemmy67@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 days agoOh, sorry I wasn’t trying to imply it was. Just adding to your statement.
Fascist regimes eventually come for the guns
Fascist regimes always come for guns. Governments that come for guns are not always fascist
A implies b, but b does not imply a.
Is your assertion that this is not a fascist regime? Otherwise you simply repeated what I said in the first sentence.
No, my assertion is that a government coming for your guns is not the reason it’s fascist
That’s fine, I agree, but that’s not what I said
Oh, sorry I wasn’t trying to imply it was. Just adding to your statement.