Pro@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoWe Should Immediately Nationalize SpaceX and Starlinkjacobin.comexternal-linkmessage-square487linkfedilinkarrow-up11.19Kcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up11.19Kexternal-linkWe Should Immediately Nationalize SpaceX and Starlinkjacobin.comPro@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square487linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareDeflated0ne@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up104·4 days agoHas anyone considered funding NASA? They made rockets that didn’t explode with duct tape and a TI-83 calculator.
minus-squareUruanna@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36·4 days agoShouldn’t be incompatible with nationalizing SpaceX and Starlink. Just give it all to NASA, actually.
minus-squareVanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·4 days agoSure, that’s the ideal. Is it likely? Ehhhh
minus-squareUruanna@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·edit-24 days agoFrom this admin? Nah. It’ll be stolen and given to, idk, Thiel or Vance or whoever, but not nationalized, just reprivatized.
minus-squareRose56@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·4 days agoThey didn’t, because someone got paid to write this article!
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-24 days agoWhere’s the grift tho? What’s the angle? How will this enrich an uber-privileged pale bro?
minus-squareGreyEyedGhost@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 days agoLooks like we found someone who believed it was financially necessary for the manufacture of the shuttle to be spread across the country.
minus-squarerottingleaf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoWhat “they made” 50 years ago is of little value now. Expertise matters, and it’s lost with time passing. Still - yes. Nationalization is a bad solution because it gives the state power to nationalize. Seems a truism. Just let NASA work in its normal role. Instead of replacing that with SpaceX contracts.
minus-squarewewbull@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 days agoIf that was actually their expenditure I don’t think they’d have their budget cut.
Has anyone considered funding NASA?
They made rockets that didn’t explode with duct tape and a TI-83 calculator.
Shouldn’t be incompatible with nationalizing SpaceX and Starlink. Just give it all to NASA, actually.
Sure, that’s the ideal.
Is it likely? Ehhhh
From this admin? Nah. It’ll be stolen and given to, idk, Thiel or Vance or whoever, but not nationalized, just reprivatized.
They didn’t, because someone got paid to write this article!
Where’s the grift tho? What’s the angle? How will this enrich an uber-privileged pale bro?
Looks like we found someone who believed it was financially necessary for the manufacture of the shuttle to be spread across the country.
What “they made” 50 years ago is of little value now. Expertise matters, and it’s lost with time passing.
Still - yes. Nationalization is a bad solution because it gives the state power to nationalize. Seems a truism.
Just let NASA work in its normal role. Instead of replacing that with SpaceX contracts.
If that was actually their expenditure I don’t think they’d have their budget cut.